Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO SSD comparison

Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO SSD

When you want to buy a new SSD and you are looking for a good performance / performance / price ratio, surely the first two brands that come to mind will be Crucial and Samsung, and that is that their SSDs are always on the top sales lists. Today, we will be comparing Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO SSD.

Both devices are presented in the same format and capacities, as well as quite affordable selling prices considering their capacities. If we take as an example the currently best-selling versions, which are the 1 TB ones, these are their sale prices without offer:

As you can see the price difference between the two is only about 20 euros, which should put the Samsung SSD, which is more expensive, as theoretically better. But is it really so? Let’s check it out.

In many manufacturers the speed of reading and writing can change depending on the capacity, but it is not the case of these two SSDs so it comes to us that not even painted to be able to make a technical comparison. In this case, Crucial’s SSD is slightly higher in terms of reading speed, but the same advantage that Samsung takes in this area is taken by Samsung in writing, so in terms of theoretical performance we could say that they are practically tied.

Where the Samsung takes relative advantage is in terms of the maximum capacity it offers, since the Crucial MX500 can only be found in capacities of up to 2 TB while the Samsung 860 EVO is offered in capacities of up to 4 TB, double. In terms of durability, the Samsung SSD takes the lead again, which thanks to its V-NAND technology offers unprecedented durability, although in terms of warranty both are backed by 5 years.

We are going to analyze the technologies that support both SSDs.

Crucial MX500 pros
Dynamic writing acceleration.
Redundant independent NAND array (RAIN).
Adaptive thermal protection.
Integrated energy loss immunity.
Support for device hibernation (DevSleep).
Active garbage collection.
TRIM support.
Self-Verification and Reporting Technology (SMART).
Error correction code (ECC).
Multi-step data integrity algorithm.

Samsung 860 EVO pros
Intelligent TurboWrite technology.
Error correction code (ECC).
Data integrity algorithm.
Active garbage collection.
TRIM support.
1 GB of cache.
DevSleep.
AES 256 bit encryption, TCG Opal and IEEE 1667.

Again we find that both SSDs are quite even in terms of technologies. Crucial’s SSD takes some advantage for its built-in power loss immunity, but it is something that Samsung’s SSD also has, although they do not indicate so since it has 1 GB of cache, precisely to safeguard data in case of power loss.

In this technical comparison of the Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO SSD we have seen that both are actually quite even. If we have to opt for one of the two models and taking into account the 20 euros of price difference that the 1 TB capacity models have, we would opt for the Samsung, since it is a more modern model and has a much longer durability. greater than that of the Crucial, although the latter is not that it falls short.